Manila: Deputy Speaker and National Unity Party chairperson Ronaldo Puno has proposed the establishment of a Constitutional Convention (ConCon) to conduct a comprehensive review of the 1987 Constitution. The aim is to address 'enduring ambiguities' and deficiencies that undermine its legal foundations and reliability as the country's supreme law.
According to Philippines News Agency, Puno made the call during a privilege speech, stating that the ConCon represents 'the most prudent, transparent and participatory mechanism' to resolve vague provisions and implement necessary reforms in the Charter. Puno emphasized that the proposal is not about discarding the Constitution but completing and correcting it.
Puno elaborated that a ConCon would empower the people, through their elected delegates, to rectify textual deficiencies, reconcile contradictions, remove ambiguities, and institutionalize essential reforms. He argued that this approach ensures the foundational law of the land meets the needs of a dynamic and democratic society.
Puno highlighted that a ConCon, as opposed to a constituent assembly, guarantees 'singularity of purpose,' enabling delegates to focus solely on constitutional matters without distractions from lawmaking, oversight functions, or impeachment concerns. He noted that this would prevent conflicts of interest, ensure broader representation, and reduce political expediency.
He cited specific instances where ambiguous provisions and textual flaws have weakened the Charter's legal foundations. One example is the interpretation of 'forthwith' in Article XI, Section 3(4) on impeachment, which was intended as a procedural safeguard against delay but has become a source of deadlock and controversy.
Puno argued that such constitutional vagueness creates loopholes, leads to political crises, and undermines the rule of law, eroding public trust and leaving citizens disillusioned with the institutions designed to serve them. He stressed the need for a constitution that is clear and understandable not only to courts and legislators but also to the citizens whose rights it protects.